Symbols

What is the price prediction for CONY Yieldmax and MSTY Yieldmax?

6/5/2025 03:36pm

Aime

The deep research logic is organized as follows: 

Okay, let's tackle this question about the price predictions for CONY and MSTY YieldMax ETFs. First, I need to check the provided references and background information to gather all relevant data. 

Starting with the references, I see that there are specific queries for CONY and MSTY's closing prices and analyst average price targets. From Query 1, CONY's last price is $8.11, and Query 3 shows MSTY at $20.83. However, when looking at the analyst price targets, Query 2 mentions an average target for Concentra Group (CON) at $27.5, and Query 4 for MicroStrategy (MSTR) at $510.8. Wait, but these are for the underlying stocks, not the ETFs themselves. The ETFs don't invest directly in the stocks, so the analyst targets for the stocks might not directly translate to the ETFs' price targets. 

Looking further, Queries 16 and 17 show that there are no analyst price predictions for the ETFs themselves. That's a red flag because without direct ETF targets, we can't rely on those numbers. The user is asking about the ETFs, not the underlying stocks, so the stock targets might not be relevant here. 

The background information from the YieldMax website (References 5 and 6) explains that these ETFs use options strategies on the underlying stocks (COIN for CONY and MSTR for MSTY). They don't hold the stocks directly, which means their performance is tied to the options strategies rather than the stocks' price movements. This is crucial because the ETFs' prices aren't directly correlated to the stocks' prices. 

Also, the ETFs have high distribution rates. For example, MSTY declared a $1.4707 dividend recently, which is a significant yield. However, these distributions are based on option income, not the underlying stock's dividends. The high yields might attract income-focused investors, but they also come with risks, as the ETFs can't guarantee distributions. 

The lack of analyst targets for the ETFs (References 16 and 17) means there's no consensus on where these ETFs might be priced in the future. The user is asking for price predictions, but without specific data on the ETFs, we can't provide a definitive target. The only related data are the stock targets, which aren't directly applicable. 

Additionally, the ETFs are non-diversified and have single-issuer risk, as mentioned in Reference 5. This means their volatility could be higher, making price predictions more uncertain. The funds' strategies cap potential gains if the underlying stock increases but expose them to losses if the stock decreases. 

Considering all this, the answer needs to highlight the lack of direct ETF price targets, explain the reliance on options strategies, mention the high distribution yields, and note the associated risks. It's important to clarify that the stock targets don't directly predict the ETFs' prices and that the ETFs' performance is more about the options strategies than the underlying stocks' price movements. 

I should structure the answer to first state the conclusion that there are no available price predictions for the ETFs, then delve into the reasons why, supported by the references. Including the tables from the queries will help visualize the data, and the visualization for the closing prices should be included as per the requirements. 

Also, since the user is asking for price predictions, it's essential to address the uncertainty and the factors that make predicting these ETFs' prices challenging. Mentioning the high risk and the nature of the options strategies will provide a comprehensive view. 

Finally, I need to ensure that all citations are correctly formatted and that the visualization is placed right after the relevant paragraph. The answer should be clear, structured, and use markdown tables where necessary to present the data effectively.

Conclusion 🎯

There are no available price predictions or analyst targets for the CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY.P) or the MSTY YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY.P) as of June 5, 2025 ¹². However, we can analyze the funds' underlying strategies, risks, and market context to provide insights into their potential performance trajectory.

Analysis 📊

1. Fund Structure & Strategy

Both CONY and MSTY are options-based ETFs that do not hold the underlying stocks (COIN or MSTR) directly ³⁴. Instead, they generate income through covered call strategies, which involve selling call options on the underlying stock. This strategy caps upside potential but provides consistent income through option premiums.

ETF	Underlying Stock	Strategy Focus	Key Risk
CONY	COIN	Covered Calls	Single-issuer risk ³
MSTY	MSTR	Covered Calls	High volatility ⁵

2. Market Context

COIN (Coinbase): Analysts project a $27.5 price target for Concentra Group (CON), but this is unrelated to CONY's ETF price ⁶.
MSTR (MicroStrategy): Analysts predict a $510.8 price target for MSTR, but again, this does not directly translate to MSTY's ETF price ⁷.

3. Distribution Yields

Both ETFs offer high monthly distributions:

CONY: Last price = $8.11 ⁸.
MSTY: Last price = $20.83 ⁹.
MSTY recently declared a $1.4707 dividend, implying a 79.53% forward yield ⁵.

4. Risks & Limitations

Single-issuer risk: Both ETFs are concentrated in one stock, making them highly volatile ³⁴.
Capped upside: The funds' gains are limited if the underlying stock rises ³.
No guarantees: Distributions are not guaranteed and depend on option income ³⁴.

Key Takeaways 📝

No direct price targets exist for CONY or MSTY ETFs.
High risk due to single-issuer concentration and options-based strategies.
High yield potential but with significant uncertainty.

1/2

MSTR Trend

For investors considering these ETFs, focus on the income potential rather than price appreciation, and be prepared for high volatility.

Source:

1. YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY.P) analyst price prediction 2025