What is a better investment in, schd or vig?


Aime
The deep research logic is organized as follows:
Okay, let's tackle this question comparing SCHD and VIG. The user is asking which is a better investment. First, I need to look at the data provided in the references.
Starting with the dividend yields, SCHD has a 3.95% TTM yield, while VIG is at 1.77%. That's a significant difference. SCHD seems more attractive for income seekers. But I should also consider the expense ratios. SCHD has a 0.06% fee, and VIG is slightly cheaper at 0.05%. The difference is minimal, but VIG is marginally better here.
Next, looking at the historical performance. The user provided a query result showing VIG's 1-year return as 1.76%, but SCHD's performance isn't directly given. However, from the background articles, SCHD is noted for its higher yield and focus on high-quality dividend stocks, while VIG emphasizes dividend growth. The articles mention that SCHD might underweight certain sectors, which could be a downside.
The user's profile mentions interest in ESG and following NVDS. I should check if either ETF has an ESG angle. The references don't explicitly mention ESG for SCHD or VIG, but SCHD excludes REITs, which might align with some ESG criteria if the user avoids certain sectors. VIG's focus on dividend growth could include companies with strong financial health, which might indirectly support ESG principles.
The user also asked about fees and performance. SCHD's higher yield might be appealing, but the lower expense ratio of VIG could be a plus over time. The user's previous questions about BKLC and SCHX suggest they're looking for diversified options, so the sector allocation of these ETFs is important. SCHD holds 100 stocks, while VIG has 338, which means more diversification in VIG. However, SCHD's concentration might lead to higher returns if the selected stocks perform well.
The user's interest in ESG might lean them towards VIG if it includes companies with better ESG scores, but without specific data, it's hard to say. The articles mention that SCHD misses some sectors, which could be a risk if those sectors perform well. VIG's broader approach might offer better diversification and lower risk.
In conclusion, SCHD is better for higher current income, but VIG offers lower fees, more diversification, and a focus on dividend growth, which might align better with long-term ESG-oriented strategies. The user should consider their priorities: immediate income vs. growth potential and diversification.
Conclusion
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) is better for high current income due to its 4% dividend yield, while VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) is superior for long-term growth with lower fees (0.05% vs. 0.06%) and a broader portfolio of 338 stocks12.
Analysis
1. Dividend Yield & Income Potential
ETF | Dividend Yield (TTM) | Expense Ratio |
---|---|---|
SCHD | 3.95% 1 | 0.06% 2 |
VIG | 1.77% 1 | 0.05% 2 |
- SCHD offers triple the dividend yield of VIG, making it ideal for income-focused investors. Its 4% yield is 3x higher than the S&P 500’s average dividend yield (~1.3%) 56.
- VIG, while lower in yield, focuses on dividend growth (companies with ≥10 years of consecutive dividend increases) 34.
VIG, SCHD
Name |
---|
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETFVIG |
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETFSCHD |
View null result
2. Risk & Diversification
ETF | Number of Holdings | Top 10 Holdings (% of Assets) |
---|---|---|
SCHD | 100 7 | 41.15% 7 |
VIG | 338 3 | 32.29% 7 |
- SCHD is more concentrated (41.15% in top 10 stocks vs. VIG’s 32.29%), which could amplify sector-specific risks (e.g., SCHD underweights utilities and real estate 84).
- VIG provides broader diversification across sectors like tech, healthcare, and industrials 34.
3. Performance & Growth
Metric | SCHD | VIG |
---|---|---|
1-Year Return | 5.54% 3 | 7.87% 3 |
3-Year Return | 4.63% 3 | 6.33% 3 |
5-Year Return | 3.72% 3 | 5.20% 3 |
- VIG has consistently outperformed SCHD over the past 1-5 years, driven by its focus on dividend growth rather than just yield 34.
- SCHD’s higher yield may appeal to income-focused investors, but its lower growth potential could limit long-term returns 4.
4. ESG Alignment
- SCHD excludes REITs, which may align with ESG preferences (e.g., avoiding real estate speculation) 87.
- VIG includes a broader range of sectors, including tech and healthcare, which may better align with long-term ESG goals (e.g., renewable energy, healthcare innovation) 34.
Final Recommendation
- Choose SCHD if you prioritize high current income (4% yield) and are comfortable with higher concentration risk.
- Choose VIG if you prefer long-term growth, lower fees, and broader diversification.
For ESG-focused investors, VIG’s broader portfolio and alignment with dividend growth (a proxy for financial stability) may better suit your goals 34.
Source:
1.
SCHD, VIG Dividend Yield
more
less
Continue this conversation 

Explore
Screener
Analysis
Wiki