What canadian stocks have a good p/e ration and pay the highest dividends

The deep research logic is organized as follows: 

Okay, let's tackle this question. The user is asking for Canadian stocks with a good P/E ratio and the highest dividends. First, I need to check the references provided. 

Looking at the references, there are a few relevant ones. Number 1 mentions a Canadian stock, BNS, with a P/E of 14.82 and a dividend yield of 6.97%. That's a solid candidate. Then, reference 6 lists three Canadian stocks: CAE, GOOS, and LULU. Their P/E ratios are 29.14, 17.45, and 20.22 respectively, with dividend yields provided. However, the dividend yields aren't explicitly stated in the table, but the query mentions the highest dividend yield. 

Wait, in reference 6, the dividend yield is listed as "Dividend Yield (TTM)[20250702]", but the values are empty. That's a problem. Maybe the data isn't available there. Let me check other references. 

Reference 8 talks about top dividend stocks in July 2025, but they're U.S. companies. However, the user is asking for Canadian stocks, so those might not be relevant. Reference 16 mentions Canadian stocks like Fortis (FTS) and Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) with dividend yields of 3.8% and 5.3% respectively. But their P/E ratios aren't provided in that reference. 

Wait, reference 16 is from 2025-06-27, so it's a bit older, but the data might still be relevant. The user is asking for the latest data as of 2025-07-02. Let me check if there's any other reference with Canadian stocks and their P/E and dividend yields. 

Reference 12 mentions a query for Canadian stocks with the highest trailing 12-month dividend yield and P/E under 25, but the results found 0. So, no data there. 

Hmm, so the only concrete data I have is from reference 1 and 6. Reference 1 has BNS with P/E 14.82 and dividend yield 6.97%. Reference 6 has three stocks with P/E between 17.45 and 29.14, but no dividend yields listed. 

Wait, the user's question is about the highest dividends. So, BNS with 6.97% is the highest in the provided data. The other stocks in reference 6 don't have dividend yields listed, so I can't include them. 

Also, the user's profile mentions interest in AI and VR, but the provided data doesn't have any Canadian stocks in those sectors. So, I need to focus on the available data. 

I should structure the answer by first stating the conclusion based on the data. Then, provide a detailed analysis with the available stocks. Since the user is interested in high dividends and good P/E, BNS fits perfectly. The other stocks in reference 6 don't have dividend data, so they can't be included. 

I also need to mention the limitations, like the lack of dividend data for some stocks and the absence of AI/VR sector stocks. 

Make sure to cite the references properly. For BNS, it's reference 1. For the other stocks, since their dividend yields aren't available, I can't include them. 

Also, check the visualization requirement. The query in reference 1 is "Region is Canada; P/E Ratio < 15; Top 1 Sorted by Dividend Yield", so I need to include the visualization after the relevant paragraph. 

So, the conclusion will highlight BNS as the top pick. The analysis will explain why, using the data from reference 1. Also, mention the other stocks from reference 6 but note the missing dividend data. 

Finally, ensure the answer is in English, uses markdown tables, and includes the necessary citations and visualizations.

### 🌟 **Conclusion** 🌟
Based on the data provided, **The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS)** stands out as the top Canadian stock with a **P/E ratio of 14.82** and the **highest dividend yield of 6.97%** . While other Canadian stocks like CAE, Canada Goose (GOOS), and Lululemon Athletica (LULU) have P/E ratios between 17.45 and 29.14, their dividend yields are not explicitly reported in the available data . Here’s a detailed breakdown:

---

### 📊 **Analysis** 📊

#### 1. **The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS)**
| Metric | Value (as of 2025-07-02) | Key Takeaway |
|------------------------|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **P/E Ratio** | 14.82 | Undervalued relative to the market, with room for upside. |
| **Dividend Yield** | 6.97% | Among the highest in the Canadian banking sector, offering stable income. |
| **Price** | $54.92 | Recent stability with a 0.06% price change over the last session. |

**Why It Fits**: BNS combines a **low P/E ratio** (below 15) with a **high dividend yield**, making it ideal for income-focused investors. Its strong balance sheet and international expansion efforts further enhance its long-term growth potential .

Region is Canada; P/E Ratio < 15; Top 1 Sorted by Dividend Yield
|code|stock code|stock name|Last Price|Last Change|Region|P/E(TTM)[20250702]|Dividend Yield (TTM)[20250702]|market_code|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|BNS|BNS.N|The Bank of Nova Scotia|54.925|0.06741|Canada|14.8226|6.968679|169|

#### 2. **Other Notable Canadian Stocks**
While their dividend yields are not explicitly reported, the following stocks have P/E ratios within the 15–30 range and could be worth monitoring:
| Stock Code | Stock Name | P/E Ratio | Key Catalysts/ Risks |
|------------|---------------------------|-----------|-----------------------|
| **CAE** | CAE | 29.14 | High valuation, but unclear dividend sustainability. |
| **GOOS** | Canada Goose | 17.45 | Recent price surge (+8.32%), but dividend data unavailable. |
| **LULU** | Lululemon Athletica | 20.22 | Moderate valuation, but dividend yield not reported. |

**Why They Matter**: These stocks show **moderate valuations** and potential for growth, but their lack of dividend data limits their appeal for income-focused investors .

---

### 🛠️ **Key Takeaways** 🛠️
1. **Top Pick**: **BNS** offers the **highest dividend yield (6.97%)** with a **low P/E ratio (14.82)**, making it the best fit for your criteria.
2. **Monitoring List**: Keep an eye on **CAE, GOOS, and LULU** for potential upside, but prioritize stocks with explicit dividend data.
3. **Limitations**: The absence of dividend yield data for some stocks highlights the need for further research or alternative data sources.

Let me know if you’d like to explore further! 🚀