What are the top 5 undervalued stocks to buy now?


Aime
The deep research logic is organized as follows:
Okay, let's tackle this question about the top 5 undervalued stocks to buy now. The user is interested in NASDAQ and has a moderate to high risk tolerance with a short to medium-term horizon. I need to use the provided references and background info to craft a comprehensive answer.
First, looking at the references, there's a query in Reference 1 that returns a single stock, Griffon (GFF), meeting the criteria: P/E <15, EPS growth >10%, ROE >15%, Debt-to-Equity <0.5. That's a strong candidate. But the user asked for 5 stocks, so I need to check other references.
Reference 6 and 16 both return 0 results for their respective queries, so those aren't helpful. Reference 21 lists top DCF-based undervalued stocks, but the top entries are large caps like Microsoft and Apple, which might not be "undervalued" in the traditional sense. However, the user's interest in NASDAQ means including tech stocks is important.
Reference 26 provides 8 sector-specific undervalued stocks. These include tech stocks like InterDigital, First Solar, MARA Holdings, and Frequency Electronics, as well as consumer goods and industrials. Since the user prefers NASDAQ, I should check which of these are listed there. For example, FSLR (First Solar) and MARA (MARA Holdings) are on NASDAQ.
Reference 17, 18, 19, and 20 discuss undervalued European and UK stocks, but the user's focus is on NASDAQ, so these might not be relevant unless there's a specific reason to include them. However, the user's profile mentions a preference for the NASDAQ Composite, so prioritizing those is key.
Reference 22 and 23 are about Indian stocks, which again might not align with the user's focus. So, focusing on the US markets, particularly NASDAQ, is better.
Now, compiling the list:
1. Griffon (GFF) from Reference 1: Meets all quantitative criteria, high EPS growth, strong ROE. It's a good start.
2. First Solar (FSLR) from Reference 26: P/E of 10.32, ROE 17.62%, part of the tech sector on NASDAQ. Solar energy is a growing field, which could appeal to a medium-term investor.
3. MARA Holdings (MARA) from Reference 26: P/E 7.87, ROE 18.84%. Tech sector, lower P/E, which might indicate undervaluation. Need to check if it's on NASDAQ—yes, MARA is listed there.
4. Frequency Electronics (FEIM) from Reference 26: P/E 7.09, ROE 44.71%. Tech sector, very high ROE. This could be a strong candidate for growth.
5. Target (TGT) from Reference 26: P/E 10.07, ROE 29.12%. Consumer staples, but TGT is on NASDAQ. However, the user's interest in tech might make this less appealing, but it's a solid performer with good metrics.
Wait, but the user's profile mentions a preference for NASDAQ, which is tech-heavy. So including more tech stocks would be better. Let me check if there are other tech stocks in the references. Reference 26 includes IDCC (InterDigital), FSLR, MARA, and FEIM. Also, Reference 11 lists undervalued stocks with high EBITDA yield, but the top entries have very high P/Es, which might not fit the undervalued criteria.
Alternatively, Reference 26's sector-specific screen includes tech stocks like IDCC, FSLR, MARA, FEIM. Let's prioritize those. So the top 5 could be:
1. Griffon (GFF) - meets all criteria, high growth.
2. InterDigital (IDCC) - tech, P/E 14.11, ROE 49.85%.
3. First Solar (FSLR) - tech, P/E 10.32, ROE 17.62%.
4. Frequency Electronics (FEIM) - tech, P/E 7.09, ROE 44.71%.
5. MARA Holdings (MARA) - tech, P/E 7.87, ROE 18.84%.
But wait, Reference 26's results include TGT (Target) and others, but the user's interest in tech might make TGT less relevant. However, the user's profile mentions a diversified approach, so including a consumer staples stock like TGT could be beneficial. Alternatively, if the user prefers tech, then stick with the tech stocks from Reference 26.
Also, check if these stocks are on NASDAQ. GFF is on NYSE, but the user's profile mentions NASDAQ. However, the user's query is about undervalued stocks in general, not strictly NASDAQ. But the user's preference for NASDAQ might mean they're open to other exchanges but prefer tech-heavy indices. So including GFF might still be acceptable if it's the only stock meeting the initial criteria.
Alternatively, if the user strictly wants NASDAQ stocks, then exclude GFF and look for others. But Reference 1 only has GFF. So perhaps the answer should include GFF as the top pick and then others from Reference 26 that are on NASDAQ.
Wait, let me check the stock exchanges:
- GFF (Griffon) is on NYSE.
- IDCC (InterDigital) is on NASDAQ.
- FSLR (First Solar) is on NASDAQ.
- MARA (MARA Holdings) is on NASDAQ.
- FEIM (Frequency Electronics) is on NASDAQ.
- TGT (Target) is on NYSE.
So, if the user's preference is for NASDAQ, then the top 5 would exclude GFF and TGT. But Reference 1 only has GFF, which is the only stock meeting the initial query's criteria. However, the user's question is about undervalued stocks in general, not limited to NASDAQ. But the user's profile mentions a preference for the NASDAQ Composite, so including NASDAQ stocks is important.
Therefore, the answer should prioritize NASDAQ-listed stocks that meet the undervaluation criteria. From Reference 26, the tech stocks on NASDAQ are IDCC, FSLR, MARA, FEIM. Additionally, Reference 1's GFF is a strong candidate but on NYSE. The user's profile mentions a diversified approach, so including GFF as the top pick and then the NASDAQ tech stocks makes sense.
So the top 5 would be:
1. Griffon (GFF) - NYSE, meets all criteria.
2. InterDigital (IDCC) - NASDAQ, tech, high ROE.
3. First Solar (FSLR) - NASDAQ, solar tech, strong growth.
4. Frequency Electronics (FEIM) - NASDAQ, tech, very high ROE.
5. MARA Holdings (MARA) - NASDAQ, tech, lower P/E.
But wait, the user's question is about the top 5 undervalued stocks, and the initial query in Reference 1 only returns GFF. The other references provide additional candidates. However, the user's profile indicates a preference for NASDAQ, so the answer should focus on NASDAQ stocks unless there's a compelling reason to include others.
Alternatively, the answer could present GFF as the top pick (from Reference 1) and then the top NASDAQ stocks from Reference 26. But the user's question is about the top 5, so combining both sources is necessary.
In conclusion, the answer should list the 5 stocks from Reference 26 that are on NASDAQ and meet the criteria, plus GFF if it's allowed. However, the user's question is about undervalued stocks in general, so including GFF is acceptable. But the user's profile mentions a preference for NASDAQ, so the answer should highlight NASDAQ stocks. Therefore, the top 5 would be the 4 tech stocks from Reference 26 (IDCC, FSLR, FEIM, MARA) plus another NASDAQ stock that meets the criteria. However, Reference 26 only lists 8 results, and the top 5 from there are IDCC, FSLR, FEIM, MARA, and RCM Technologies (RCMT), but RCMT is on NYSE. So the top 5 NASDAQ stocks from Reference 26 are IDCC, FSLR, FEIM, MARA, and perhaps another. Wait, Reference 26's results include TGT (Target) on NYSE, so the NASDAQ stocks are IDCC, FSLR, FEIM, MARA, and maybe others. Let me check the list again:
From Reference 26, the 8 results are:
1. IDCC (InterDigital) - IT, NASDAQ
2. AKO.A (Andina Bottling) - Consumer Staples, NYSE
3. FSLR (First Solar) - IT, NASDAQ
4. TGT (Target) - Consumer Staples, NYSE
5. RCMT (RCM Technologies) - Industrials, NYSE
6. MARA (MARA Holdings) - IT, NASDAQ
7. FEIM (Frequency Electronics) - IT, NASDAQ
8. CALM (Cal-Maine Foods) - Consumer Staples, NYSE
So the NASDAQ stocks from Reference 26 are IDCC, FSLR, MARA, FEIM. That's four. To get five, perhaps include another from Reference 1 (GFF) even though it's on NYSE, as it's the only stock meeting the initial criteria. Alternatively, check if there are other NASDAQ stocks in the references. Reference 11 lists undervalued stocks with high EBITDA yield, but the top entries have very high P/Es, which might not fit the undervalued criteria. Reference 26's results are more relevant.
Therefore, the top 5 undervalued stocks would be:
1. Griffon (GFF) - NYSE (from Reference 1)
2. InterDigital (IDCC) - NASDAQ (from Reference 26)
3. First Solar (FSLR) - NASDAQ (from Reference 26)
4. Frequency Electronics (FEIM) - NASDAQ (from Reference 26)
5. MARA Holdings (MARA) - NASDAQ (from Reference 26)
But the user's profile mentions a preference for NASDAQ, so maybe prioritize the NASDAQ stocks first. However, GFF is the only stock meeting the initial criteria from Reference 1, which is a strict filter. The other references have broader criteria. So the answer should present GFF as the top pick and then the NASDAQ stocks from Reference 26. Alternatively, if the user's question is about the top 5 undervalued stocks regardless of exchange, then include GFF and the four NASDAQ stocks. But the user's profile suggests a preference for NASDAQ, so the answer should highlight the NASDAQ stocks first.
Wait, the user's question is "What are the top 5 undervalued stocks to buy now?" without specifying the exchange. However, the user's profile indicates a preference for NASDAQ. So the answer should include NASDAQ stocks as much as possible. Therefore, the top 5 would be the four NASDAQ stocks from Reference 26 plus another from Reference 1 if possible. But Reference 1 only has GFF. So the answer would list GFF as the top pick and then the four NASDAQ stocks. However, the user's profile mentions a short to medium-term horizon, so stocks with high growth potential (like FSLR, MARA) would be suitable.
In summary, the answer should present the 5 stocks as follows:
1. Griffon (GFF) - meets strict criteria from Reference 1.
2. InterDigital (IDCC) - NASDAQ tech, high ROE.
3. First Solar (FSLR) - NASDAQ tech, solar growth.
4. Frequency Electronics (FEIM) - NASDAQ tech, very high ROE.
5. MARA Holdings (MARA) - NASDAQ tech, lower P/E.
Additionally, include a note about the user's preference for NASDAQ and highlight the tech sector alignment. Also, mention the market sentiment from Reference 7, which indicates volatility but potential for growth stocks. The answer should tie in the user's profile, emphasizing short to medium-term potential and sector-specific growth areas like tech and industrials.
Top 5 Undervalued Stocks for Short-to-Medium-Term Growth
Based on proprietary data, market sentiment, and the user’s preference for NASDAQ Composite exposure (with a focus on tech and undervalued metrics), here’s a curated list of high-potential stocks:
1. Griffon Corporation (GFF)
- Key Metrics:
- P/E (TTM): 13.61 (below 15 threshold) 1
- EPS YoY Growth: 81.71% (well above 10%) 1
- ROE: 31.3% (exceeds 15% threshold) 1
- Debt-to-Equity: 6.48% (far below 0.5) 1
- Quantitative Score: 0.8 (top recommendation) 1.
- Why Buy? Its explosive earnings growth and minimal debt position it as a high-risk, high-reward play in industrials.
p/e ratio < 15; eps yoy growth rate > 10%; roe > 15%; debt-to-equity ratio < 0.5; top 5 sorted by quantitative recommendation score(1)
Last Price($) | Last Change% | P/E(TTM) | Diluted Eps Yoy Growth% | ROE(Average)% | Debt-to-Equity Ratio% | Quantitative Recommendation Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
68.31 | -2.37% | 13.61 | 81.71 | 31.30 | 6.48 | 0.80 |
Ticker |
---|
GFFGriffon |
View 1 result
2. InterDigital (IDCC)
- Key Metrics:
- P/E (TTM): 14.11 2
- ROE: 49.85% 2
- Sector: Information Technology (NASDAQ).
- Why Buy? A leader in wireless tech licensing, IDCC trades at a discount despite 49.85% ROE, indicating strong reinvestment potential. Its alignment with 5G infrastructure growth aligns with the user’s tech-focused profile.
3. First Solar (FSLR)
- Key Metrics:
- P/E (TTM): 10.32 2
- ROE: 17.62% 2
- Sector: Information Technology (NASDAQ).
- Why Buy? A solar energy pioneer with 10.32 P/E and 17.62% ROE, FSLR benefits from the global energy transition. Its undervaluation relative to growth prospects makes it a moderate-risk tech play.
4. Frequency Electronics (FEIM)
- Key Metrics:
- P/E (TTM): 7.09 2
- ROE: 44.71% 2
- Sector: Information Technology (NASDAQ).
- Why Buy? Specializes in RF/microwave solutions for defense and aerospace. Its 7.09 P/E and 44.71% ROE suggest a low-risk, high-reward opportunity in a defensively oriented tech subsector.
5. MARA Holdings (MARA)
- Key Metrics:
- P/E (TTM): 7.87 2
- ROE: 18.84% 2
- Sector: Information Technology (NASDAQ).
- Why Buy? A blockchain infrastructure company with 7.87 P/E and 18.84% ROE. Its undervaluation relative to the broader tech sector (e.g., S&P 500 P/E of 21.39 3) positions it as a high-growth play in a volatile market.
Market Context & Risks
- Volatility Alert: The S&P 500 has experienced extreme swings recently, with a 100% historical success rate of forecasting directional moves post-volatility spikes 4.
- Tech Sector Focus: Aligns with the user’s NASDAQ preference and the current AI-driven tech rally.
- Undervaluation Drivers: Low P/E ratios (below 15) and high ROE (>15%) signal strong fundamentals, but investors should monitor debt levels and industry-specific risks (e.g., solar policy changes for FSLR).
Conclusion
These stocks balance undervaluation metrics (P/E, ROE) with sector-specific growth catalysts (tech, industrials). For a user with a short-to-medium-term horizon, GFF (industrials) and FEIM (defense tech) offer immediate upside, while IDCC and FSLR provide exposure to high-growth tech themes. Monitor the NASDAQ Composite’s volatility trends 4 to time entries effectively.
Source:
1.
P/E Ratio < 15; EPS YoY Growth Rate > 10%; ROE > 15%; Debt-to-Equity Ratio < 0.5; Top 5 Sorted by Quantitative Recommendation Score
more
less
Continue this conversation 

Explore
Screener
Analysis
Learn
News