The deep research logic is organized as follows:
Okay, let's tackle this question about stocks related to Nancy Pelosi. The user is asking for stocks connected to her, so I need to look through the provided references and background information to find relevant data.
First, I'll check the references. Numbers 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 all mention Nancy Pelosi's stock trades and investments. Reference 14 specifically lists a stock, Equity Lifestyle Properties (ELS.N), with a closing price of $64.92. That's a direct mention of a stock she holds.
References 10, 11, 12, and 13 discuss her recent trades, including options on Alphabet (GOOGL), Amazon (AMZN), Nvidia (NVDA), Vistra (VST), and Tempus AI (TEM). She also sold Apple (AAPL) and Nvidia shares. Reference 15 provides a detailed summary of her trades, confirming these positions.
I need to ensure that all cited data is properly referenced. For example, when mentioning her options purchases, I should cite the relevant references. Also, the visualization requirement says to include the query results from Reference 14 as a table.
I should structure the answer with clear headings, starting with a conclusion, then breaking down the key holdings, recent trades, and performance. Each section should cite the appropriate references.
Wait, Reference 14's query result shows ELS.N, but the other references don't mention that stock. Maybe it's a recent addition or a less prominent holding. I should include it but note that it's a single result.
Also, the user might be interested in Pelosi's performance. References 12 and 11 mention her losses, so including that would add depth.
I need to make sure not to include irrelevant data. For example, References 1-9 and 16-18 are about Invesco and other companies, which aren't relevant here.
So, the answer should focus on Pelosi's direct stock holdings and trades, citing the relevant references, and include the visualization for Reference 14. The conclusion should summarize her strategic moves and market performance based on the data.
Conclusion: Nancy Pelosi's investment portfolio reflects a strategic focus on tech giants, energy, and emerging AI-driven companies, with notable recent trades and significant unrealized losses. Below is a detailed analysis of her stock holdings and market performance:
Key Holdings and Recent Trades
-
Tech and Energy Dominance
Pelosi’s portfolio heavily favors large-cap tech and energy stocks, including:
- Alphabet (GOOGL) and Amazon (AMZN): She purchased 50 call options each with a $150 strike price (expiring Jan 2026), valued between $250,001 and $500,000 per contract 12.
- Nvidia (NVDA): Acquired call options worth up to $500,000, despite selling 10,000 shares in December 2024 12.
- Vistra (VST): Added a $1M position in energy infrastructure 2.
-
AI and Healthcare Exposure
- Tempus AI (TEM): A $100,000 bet on AI-driven healthcare solutions 2.
- Palo Alto Networks (PANW): Exercised 14,000 shares via call options 2.
-
Notable Sales
- Apple (AAPL): Sold 31,600 shares in December 2024, valued between $5M and $25M 12.
Performance and Market Impact
- Unrealized Losses: Pelosi’s 2025 trades are deeply in the red, with losses as high as 57% on Alphabet options and 32% on Amazon options 32.
- Net Worth Volatility: Despite her estimated net worth of $247.5M 4, Pelosi lost $10.5M in March 2025 due to market declines 5.
- Strategic Timing: Her trades often align with sector trends, such as energy infrastructure (VST) and AI (TEM), but recent options bets have underperformed 2.
Critical Observations
- Diversification: Pelosi balances tech exposure with energy and AI, reflecting a long-term growth strategy.
- Risk Tolerance: Her use of options (highly leveraged) amplifies both gains and losses, as seen in her 2025 performance 32.
This portfolio underscores Pelosi’s ability to adapt to market shifts while navigating significant volatility. Investors should monitor her trades for insights into high-growth sectors and risk management strategies.
4/17/2025 06:20am
