FAGIX


Aime
Fidelity Capital & Income Fund (FAGIX) offers a balanced investment approach with a focus on income and capital growth. Here's a detailed analysis:
- Investment Strategy:
- Income and Growth: The fund aims to provide a combination of income and capital growth.
- High-Yield Bonds: It invests in equity and debt securities, including defaulted securities, with an emphasis on lower-quality debt securities1.
- Portfolio Composition:
- Diversification: The fund holds a diversified portfolio with a focus on high-yield bonds.
- Risk Profile: It has a high risk profile due to its investment in lower-quality securities1.
- Performance Overview:
- Recent Performance: As of the latest data, FAGIX has a 1-year return of 11.8% and a 3-year return of 3.5%1.
- Long-Term Performance: Over the past 5 years, the fund has delivered an annualized return of 6.7%1.
- Expense and Yield:
- Expense Ratio: The fund has a relatively high expense ratio of 0.68%, which can impact overall returns2.
- Dividend Yield: The fund has a trailing dividend yield of 5.19%, which is below the category average1.
- Risk and Considerations:
- High Yield and Risk: The fund's high-yield bond investment carries inherent risk of default and volatility1.
- Market Conditions: The fund's performance is influenced by market trends, and it may not perform well in all market environments.
- Comparison and Context:
- Benchmark Comparison: FAGIX's performance should be compared to a relevant benchmark, such as the S&P 500 or a similar income fund.
- Investment Horizon: The fund is suitable for investors with a longer investment horizon due to its balanced approach.
In conclusion, FAGIX is a fund that balances income and capital growth through investment in high-yield bonds and lower-quality debt securities. It carries a moderate level of risk due to its high-yield bond investment and relatively high expense ratio. It is suitable for investors with a longer time horizon and a tolerance for moderate risk in search of a balanced investment approach.
Source:
more
less
Continue this conversation 

Explore
Screener
Analysis
Learn
Wiki