The EPS of FAAS in Q2 2021 was not disclosed, however, I can infer that the company's financials in Q2 2021 were impacted by one-time costs related to the company's public listing and restructuring. These costs resulted in a small EBITDA gap of -$0.14 million in FY2023 and a projection of -$0.07 for 20241. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that similar costs may have been incurred in Q2 2021, leading to a negative EPS.
- One-Time Costs of Public Listing and Restructuring: The company's financial results for FY2023 and FY2024 were impacted by one-time costs associated with the public listing and restructuring. These costs are not recurring and therefore can have a significant impact on the financial results of a period.
- Impact on EBITDA: The small EBITDA gap in FY2023 and the projection for 2024 indicate that the company's profitability was affected by these one-time costs. EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) is a measure of a company's operating performance, and a gap of -$0.14 million in FY2023 and -$0.07 for 2024 suggests that the company's operating performance was not as strong as it could have been due to these costs.
- Assumption of Similar Costs in Q2 2021: Since the company's financial results for FY2023 and FY2024 were impacted by these one-time costs, it is reasonable to assume that similar costs may have been incurred in Q2 2021, leading to a negative EPS. However, without specific information on the company's expenses in Q2 2021, it is impossible to say for certain what the EPS was for that quarter.
In conclusion, the EPS of FAAS in Q2 2021 was likely negative due to one-time costs related to the company's public listing and restructuring, similar to the ones that impacted the company's financials in FY2023 and FY2024.
4/10/2025 04:41am
