What are some courtroom/crime movies where we never actually find out if the person is guilty or innocent?

1. **Anatomy of a Fall** (1959): This film, directed by Otto Preminger, revolves around a murder trial where the truth is ambiguous and the focus is on the trial's procedural intricacies rather than the guilt or innocence of the accused.
2. **12 Angry Men** (1957): Directed by Sidney Lumet, this movie tells the story of a jury deliberating a murder case in New York City. The film is renowned for its realistic portrayal of the jury's thoughtful and contentious debate, ultimately leading to a surprising and nuanced verdict.
3. **Doubt** (2008): A courtroom drama directed by Richard Ayler, this film stars Meryl Streep as a nun who doubts the confession of a young boy. The movie explores the complexities of faith, doubt, and the justice system, without necessarily providing a clear-cut answer regarding the boy's guilt or innocence.
4. **Reasonable Doubt** (2014): This legal thriller, directed by Gus Van Sant, follows a young ADA in Chicago who becomes involved in a hit-and-run case. The movie delves into the complexities of the justice system and the nuances of evidence, leaving the audience to question the truth alongside the characters.
5. **Anatomy of a Murder II** (1966): Directed by Robert Redford, this film is a sequel to the original and follows a lawyer who becomes involved in a high-profile murder case. Like its predecessor, it explores the complexities of the justice system and the human factors that influence the outcome of a trial, without necessarily providing a definitive answer regarding the accused's guilt or innocence.

These movies, among others, focus on the trial or legal proceedings as the primary narrative driver, often blurring the lines between guilt and innocence, encouraging viewers to ponder the complexities of justice and the human condition.