But does a safety net program to address inequality and underlying causes not become more of a socialism by taking money from one class of people and giving to it a different class

The question of whether a safety net program constitutes socialism depends on how it is designed and implemented. Here are some key points to consider:

1. Socialist Philosophy: Socialism is an economic and political philosophy that advocates for social ownership of the means of production and the distribution of goods and services based on need. A safety net program that is designed to address inequality and underlying causes could be seen as socialistic if it involves significant government ownership and control of the economy.
2. Funding Mechanisms: Safety net programs can be funded through various mechanisms, including taxes, general government revenue, or other sources. If a safety net program is primarily funded through taxes on higher-income individuals or corporations, it could be seen as a more progressive policy that addresses income inequality.
3. Targeted vs. Universal Assistance: A safety net program that is targeted to specific groups based on need, such as low-income families or individuals, could be seen as less socialistic than a universal program that provides assistance to all citizens. The design of the program can significantly impact its perceived socialistic nature.
4. Balancing Efficiency and Equity: In a market economy, there is a trade-off between efficiency and equity. Safety net programs can help balance this trade-off by providing support to those who are struggling economically, while also contributing to economic stability and growth.
5. Political Spectrum: Social democratic and democratic socialist parties and movements have historically been at the forefront of advocating for safety net programs and social welfare policies