Symbols

Compare between ionq, qubt, qbts, rgti, qs and advise as to the best investment today

3/19/2025 04:24am

Aime

The deep research logic is organized as follows: 

Okay, let's tackle this comparison between IonQ (IONQ), Quantum Computing (QUBT), D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), Rigetti Computing (RGTI), and QuantumScape (QS). The user wants to know which is the best investment today. 

First, I need to look at the financial data from the references. All these companies are in the quantum computing or related sectors, which are still emerging. Let's start with their latest revenue and net income. 

IONQ has the highest revenue at $11.71 million in Q4 2024, but they're still losing money, with a net loss of $202 million. QUBT's revenue is much lower at $101,000, and they're also in the red. QBTS and RGTI have revenues around $2.3 million and $2.27 million, respectively, but both are losing money. QS doesn't have revenue data but has a significant net loss. 

Next, looking at technical indicators like MACD, RSI, and KDJ. IONQ has a MACD of 1.02 and RSI of 46.1, which is neutral. QUBT has a higher RSI of 83.79, indicating it might be overbought. QBTS has an RSI of 83, which is also high. RGTI's RSI is 57.97, and QS has 46.15. Moving averages show IONQ's price is below the 20-day MA, suggesting a bearish trend. QUBT is above its 5-day MA, which is bullish. 

Fund flows are mixed. IONQ is seeing outflows, while QUBT and QBTS have inflows. RGTI has significant inflows. 

The user is interested in high-growth sectors like AI and quantum computing. IONQ has partnerships with big companies and a strong patent portfolio, which could be a plus. QUBT is cheaper but has very low revenue. QBTS and RGTI have recent breakthroughs, like QBTS's quantum annealing computer outperforming a supercomputer. 

Valuation-wise, IONQ is expensive with a high GF Score. QUBT and QBTS are more affordable but riskier. RGTI's recent surge might indicate momentum. 

Considering the user's interest in NASDAQ and growth stocks, IONQ's strategic moves and partnerships could make it a better bet despite high risks. However, the high valuation and losses are concerns. QUBT and QBTS are cheaper but with lower revenue. 

In conclusion, IONQ might be the best investment due to its leadership and partnerships, but it's a high-risk play. The user should be cautious and consider diversifying.

Comparison of IONQ, QUBT, QBTS, RGTI, QS: Key Insights for Today’s Investment Decision
Based on financial performance, technical indicators, and market positioning, IonQ (IONQ) emerges as the most compelling investment among these quantum computing stocks, though risks remain elevated. Below is a structured analysis:

1. Financial Performance & Growth Potential

Stock	Total Revenue (MRQ)	Net Income (MRQ)	Key Catalysts
IONQ	$11.71M	-$202M	Strong patent portfolio (~400+ patents), U.S. Air Force contracts ($54.5M), and partnerships with Microsoft/AWS .
QUBT	$101K	-$5.68M	Low revenue but recent 7.6% price surge; focuses on photonics and quantum authentication .
QBTS	$2.31M	-$86.08M	Quantum annealing breakthrough vs. supercomputers; 128% YoY bookings growth .
RGTI	$2.27M	-$152.96M	Recent 8% price rebound; $21.1M U.S. Air Force contract .
QS	N/A	-$114.66M	Focus on solid-state batteries; no revenue yet .

QUBT, QBTS, QS, IONQ, RGTI Total Revenue, Net Income...

Analysis:

IONQ leads in revenue and strategic partnerships, though profitability remains distant.
QBTS and RGTI show momentum in bookings (128% YoY for QBTS), but losses persist.
QS lacks revenue and faces skepticism about its battery tech.

2. Technical Indicators & Market Sentiment

Stock	MACD	RSI	KDJ	5-Day MA vs. Price
IONQ	1.02	46.1	95.89	Price < 20-day MA (bearish)
QUBT	0.99	83.79	112.18	Price > 5-day MA (bullish)
QBTS	1.3	83	107.11	Price > 5-day MA (bullish)
RGTI	0.69	57.97	96.61	Price < 10-day MA (neutral)
QS	0	46.15	61.09	Price < 20-day MA (bearish)

Analysis:

QUBT and QBTS show overbought signals (RSI >80), suggesting short-term caution.
IONQ and RGTI are oversold (RSI <50), but IONQ’s high KDJ (95.89) hints at bullish momentum.

3. Fund Flows & Institutional Activity

Stock	Net Fund Flow	Block Order Flow
IONQ	-$16.06M	-$15.62M
QUBT	+$4.95M	+$4.43M
QBTS	+$652K	+$970K
RGTI	+$15.06M	+$14.79M
QS	+$536K	+$669K

QUBT, QBTS, QS, IONQ, RGTI Net Fund Flow

Analysis:

RGTI and QBTS attract institutional capital, while IONQ faces short-term selling pressure.

4. Valuation & Risk Profile

Stock	GF Value	Piotroski F-Score	Key Risk
IONQ	$68.51	3/9	High valuation (55 GF Score), cash burn ($120M projected 2025 EBITDA loss) .
QUBT	N/A	2/9	Micro-cap volatility, low liquidity .
QBTS	N/A	4/9	Overbought technicals, reliance on GTC 2025 .
RGTI	N/A	5/9	Moderate risk; improving cash flow from contracts .
QS	N/A	1/9	No revenue, battery tech skepticism .

Analysis:

IONQ is a high-risk, high-reward play; its GF Value suggests 210% upside if quantum computing scales.
RGTI offers a balance of growth (bookings) and moderate risk.

5. Strategic Catalysts

IONQ: Participation in NVIDIA’s Quantum Day at GTC 2025; $372M ATM equity offering to fund expansion .
QBTS: Quantum annealing supremacy vs. supercomputers; 128% bookings growth .
RGTI: $21.1M U.S. Air Force contract; recent 8% price rebound .

Final Recommendation

Best Investment Today: IonQ (IONQ)

Why: Dominates quantum networking patents, U.S. Air Force contracts, and NVIDIA’s Quantum Day exposure. While risky, its GF Value and institutional partnerships justify a speculative position.
Alternative: Rigetti Computing (RGTI) for lower volatility and recent institutional inflows.

Key Risks:

IONQ: High valuation, cash burn, and Kerrisdale’s short thesis.
QBTS/QUBT: Overbought technicals and micro-cap liquidity risks.

Actionable Strategy:

Aggressive Investors: Allocate 30% to IONQ, 20% to QBTS (GTC 2025 catalyst).
Conservative Investors: Avoid; wait for clearer quantum computing adoption signals.