This is Denise again. How much should Inalloxate to OKLO and how much to SMR or should I just stick with OKLO?

``` The deep research logic is organized as follows: Okay, let's tackle this question. The user, Denise, is looking to allocate $135 between OKLO and SMR. She's got a high-risk tolerance and aims for high returns in 3-5 years. Her portfolio already includes tech stocks like NVIDIA, Snowflake, and others, so she's into growth stocks. First, I need to compare OKLO and SMR based on the provided references. Let's start with their market positions. From the references, OKLO is ahead in licensing timelines, has a proven technology with EBR-II, and a first-mover advantage with deployment in 2027. SMR, on the other hand, is collaborating with big tech companies like Meta, Microsoft, and Oracle, which could drive demand for their SMR tech. Looking at financials, both companies have negative net income. OKLO's Q1 2025 net loss was $9.81M, while SMR's was $30.4M. However, OKLO's diluted EPS growth rate is higher (-79% vs. -48% for SMR). Market cap-wise, OKLO is valued at $8.5B compared to SMR's $2.6B, but the user's Reddit source mentions OKLO is undervalued relative to SMR. Regulatory progress is a big factor. OKLO just completed a readiness assessment with the NRC, which is a positive sign. SMR is also making strides but seems behind in timelines. The user's background mentions a focus on AI and tech, so SMR's partnerships with tech giants might align better with her interests. Considering the user's short holding period (1.32 days), she's looking for quick gains. OKLO has shown higher volatility and recent price surges, which could offer quicker returns. SMR's collaborations might provide more stable growth but with a longer timeline. The user's portfolio already includes high-growth tech stocks, so adding SMR could diversify her tech exposure. However, OKLO's potential in the AI and cloud energy sector (as mentioned in references) might complement her existing tech holdings. I should structure the answer by comparing key metrics, market positioning, and alignment with her investment goals. Highlight the risks and why each stock might fit her strategy. Then, suggest an allocation based on her risk tolerance and goals. Maybe a 70-30 split towards OKLO for higher upside and SMR for tech alignment. Also, mention the importance of monitoring regulatory developments and partnerships. ``` ### **Conclusion** 🚨 **Allocate 70% ($94.5) to OKLO and 30% ($39.5) to SMR**. OKLO offers higher upside potential due to its regulatory progress, first-mover advantage, and alignment with AI-driven energy demand, while SMR provides diversification through tech partnerships and long-term growth prospects. --- ### **Analysis** 📊 #### **1. Market Positioning** | Metric | OKLO | SMR | |----------------------------|--------------------------|----------------------| | **Licensing Timeline** | Leading (2027 deployment) | Lagging (2030s) | | **Technology** | Proven (EBR-II tested 1964-1994) | NRC-approved but unproven | | **Partnerships** | Equinix, Wyoming hyperscale, OpenAI | Meta, Microsoft, Oracle | | **Regulatory Environment** | Favorable (Trump administration support) | Neutral (NRC delays) | **Key Takeaway**: OKLO is closer to commercialization and has a proven track record, while SMR benefits from tech giant partnerships but faces longer timelines. --- #### **2. Financial Health** | Metric | OKLO | SMR | |----------------------------|------------------------|-------------------| | **Revenue (2025Q1)** | $0M (no revenue) | $13.38M | | **Net Loss (2025Q1)** | -$9.81M | -$30.4M | | **Diluted EPS Growth** | -79% YoY | -48% YoY | | **Market Cap** | $8.5B | $2.6B | **Key Takeaway**: Both companies are pre-profitable, but OKLO’s smaller market cap and higher EPS growth rate suggest undervaluation relative to SMR . --- #### **3. Risk & Alignment with Your Goals** | Factor | OKLO | SMR | |----------------------------|-----------------------|-----------------| | **Regulatory Risk** | High (NRC approvals pending) | High (NRC delays) | | **Tech Alignment** | AI/data center energy | Cloud infrastructure | | **Growth Potential** | High (2027 deployment, $58/share target ) | Moderate (2030s deployment) | | **Risk-Tolerance Fit** | High (speculative, 80x+ P/S ) | Moderate (established partnerships) | **Key Takeaway**: OKLO aligns better with your high-risk tolerance and AI-focused portfolio, while SMR offers diversification through tech partnerships. --- #### **4. Allocation Strategy** | Stock | Allocation | Rationale | |-------|------------|-----------| | **OKLO** | 70% ($94.5) | Higher upside potential, closer to commercialization, and alignment with AI-driven energy demand . | | **SMR** | 30% ($39.5) | Diversification through tech partnerships (Meta, Microsoft) and long-term growth . | --- ### **Final Thoughts** 🚨 OKLO is the **high-risk, high-reward** play with near-term catalysts (2027 deployment, NRC approvals), while SMR provides **stability** through established partnerships. Stick with OKLO if you’re chasing rapid growth, but balance with SMR for tech-sector diversification. Monitor regulatory updates closely! 🚨