How about Quant?

``` The deep research logic is organized as follows: Okay, let's tackle the user's question about whether Quant (QNT) is a Layer 1 blockchain. First, I need to check the provided references to gather accurate information. Looking through the references, I see several mentions of Quant. For example, Reference 11 describes Quant as a blockchain project focused on interoperability, using the Overledger operating system. It mentions that QNT is a utility token for this system. Reference 21 and 22 also talk about Quant Network as a blockchain operating system, not a Layer 1 blockchain itself. Instead, it connects different blockchains, acting as a middleware or Layer 0. The user's previous questions about Layer 1 and Layer 2 cryptocurrencies indicate they're looking for a clear classification. From the references, Quant isn't a Layer 1 because it doesn't have its own blockchain. Instead, it's a Layer 0 solution that enables communication between various Layer 1 blockchains. I should structure the answer to first state the conclusion, then provide the analysis with supporting references. Also, include a table to clarify the classification. Make sure to cite the relevant references properly and use the visualization as required. Wait, the user's query is about Quant, and the references include a Query result (Number 10) that lists stocks related to Layer 1 blockchains. However, Quant isn't listed there, which supports the conclusion that it's not a Layer 1. Additionally, the whitepaper (Reference 24) and other articles (References 21, 22, 26, 28) all describe Quant as a middleware or operating system, not a Layer 1. So, the answer should clearly state that Quant is not a Layer 1 blockchain but a Layer 0 solution. Use the table to compare Layer 0, 1, and 2, and cite the relevant references. Also, include the visualization for the Query result if applicable, but since the user's question is about Quant, the visualization for Query 10 might not be directly relevant. However, the instructions say to include the visualization immediately after the paragraph citing the Query. Since the answer doesn't directly cite Query 10, maybe it's not needed here. Wait, the user's question is about Quant, and the references include Query 10 which is about Layer 1 blockchains. But the answer doesn't cite Query 10, so the visualization isn't required. The main references to use are 11, 21, 22, 26, 28, and 24. I need to ensure the answer is concise, starts with a conclusion, uses a table, and cites the references correctly. Also, the user's profile mentions interest in technical analysis and news-driven strategies, so the answer should be detailed but clear. Putting it all together, the answer should state that Quant is a Layer 0 blockchain operating system, explain what that means, and provide the table with classifications. Cite the relevant references to back up the claims. Make sure to follow the format requirements, including bold headings and proper citations. ``` **Conclusion** **Quant (QNT) is not a Layer 1 blockchain but a Layer 0 blockchain operating system** designed to enable interoperability between different blockchain networks. Here’s the breakdown: --- ### **Analysis** #### 1. **Layer Classification** | Layer | Description | Quant’s Role | |-------|-------------|---------------| | **Layer 0** | Middleware protocols enabling communication between blockchains | **Quant (QNT)**: Acts as a universal translator via Overledger, connecting Layer 1 blockchains . | | **Layer 1** | Native blockchain networks (e.g., Ethereum, Solana) | **Not applicable**: Quant does not operate its own blockchain . | | **Layer 2** | Scalability solutions (e.g., Optimism, Polygon) | **Not applicable**: Quant focuses on cross-chain integration, not scaling . | #### 2. **Key Features of Quant** - **Overledger**: A decentralized operating system that allows seamless communication between blockchains . - **QNT Token**: Serves as the utility token for governance and transactions within the Overledger ecosystem . - **Interoperability**: Enables cross-chain asset transfers, smart contracts, and decentralized applications (dApps) . #### 3. **Why It’s Layer 0** - **Middleware Functionality**: Quant acts as a bridge between Layer 1 blockchains, not a standalone blockchain . - **No Native Blockchain**: Unlike Layer 1 networks (e.g., Ethereum), Quant does not have its own consensus mechanism or transaction processing layer . - **Focus on Connectivity**: Quant’s core purpose is to solve the interoperability problem in the blockchain ecosystem . #### 4. **Market Context** - **Recent Momentum**: QNT price surged 52.06% YoY in 2025, driven by its role in cross-chain DeFi and Web3 adoption . - **Partnerships**: Collaborations with major players like Accenture and Coinbase highlight its strategic importance in blockchain infrastructure . --- ### **Conclusion** Quant (QNT) is a **Layer 0 blockchain operating system**, not a Layer 1 blockchain. Its unique role as a universal translator for blockchains makes it a critical piece of the Web3 ecosystem, enabling seamless communication and integration between different networks. Quant cryptocurrency layer 1 blockchain |code|stock code|stock name|Last Price|Last Change|topic|Inclusion Reason|market_code| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |ARBK|ARBK.O|Argo Blockchain|0.3944|6.970437|||185| |KULR|KULR.A|KULR Technology|1.19|3.478261|||170| |HIVE|HIVE.O|HIVE Digital|1.94|3.1914890000000002|||186| |XPL|XPL.A|Solitario Resources|0.673|2.858016|||170| |BTDR|BTDR.O|Bitdeer|13.25|2.633617|||186| |ACN|ACN.N|Accenture|316.4|1.118568|||169| |MPTI|MPTI.A|M-tron Industries|46.15|0.764192|||170| |AMZN|AMZN.O|Amazon.com|207.23|0.738904|||185| |BLK|BLK.N|BlackRock|988.97|0.696445|||169| |XYZ|XYZ.N|Block|63.86|0.551094|||169|