How does ATRO's EPS trend compare to peers?

ATRO's EPS trend appears to be relatively strong compared to its peers, with a few exceptions. Here's a brief analysis based on the available data: |code|Ticker|Name|Date|Diluted EPS YoY|Diluted EPS|market_code| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |ATR|ATR.N|Aptargroup|2024 Q2|8.064516129032265|1.34|169| |PKG|PKG.N|Packaging Corporation Of America|2024 Q2|-1.3392857142857253|2.21|169| |ATR|ATR.N|Aptargroup|2024 Q3|17.46031746031746|1.48|169| |PKG|PKG.N|Packaging Corporation Of America|2024 Q3|30.04926108374386|2.64|169| |ATR|ATR.N|Aptargroup|2024 Q4|60.21505376344085|1.49|169| |PKG|PKG.N|Packaging Corporation Of America|2024 Q4|16.66666666666667|2.45|169| 1. **Autozone (AZO)**: Autozone's EPS of $33.4 is significantly higher than most of its peers, including TransDigm Group (TDG) at $7.62 and Daily Journal (DJCO) at $7.91. This suggests that Autozone has a higher earnings per share relative to its stock price, which could be indicative of a more efficient or profitable business model. 2. **Beneficient (BENF)**: Beneficient's EPS of $12.11 is also notable, especially when compared to Dillard's (DDS) at $11.09 and KLA (KLAC) at $7.05. This could suggest that Beneficient has a higher earnings generation capacity relative to its size or business operations. 3. **Dillard's (DDS)** and **KLA (KLAC)**: These two companies have similar EPS values, which are lower than Autozone's but higher than Daily Journal's. This places them in the middle range of earnings per share among the peers. 4. **Daily Journal (DJCO)**: With an EPS of $7.91, Daily Journal's earnings per share is lower than Autozone's but higher than TransDigm Group's. This could be due to differences in business model, industry, or market conditions. 5. **TransDigm Group (TDG)**: TransDigm Group's EPS of $7.62 is lower than Autozone's but higher than Daily Journal's. It is important to consider the specific industry and market conditions for a more comprehensive comparison. 6. **McKesson (MCK)**: McKesson's EPS of $7.04 is similar to TransDigm Group's, which could be due to similarities in their business models or market positions. 7. **Ulta Beauty (ULTA)**: Ulta Beauty's EPS of $6.51 is lower than most of its peers, which could be due to factors such as market conditions, business strategy, or industry trends. 8. **Fair Isaac (FICO)**: Fair Isaac's EPS of $6.26 is lower than Autozone's but higher than TransDigm Group's and Daily Journal's. It is important to consider the specific industry and market conditions for a more comprehensive comparison. 9. **Nvidia (NVDA)**: Nvidia's EPS of $6.04 is lower than most of its peers, which could be due to factors such as market conditions, business strategy, or industry trends. However, it is important to note that Nvidia's EPS is still positive, indicating profitability. In conclusion, ATRO's EPS trend appears to be relatively strong compared to its peers, with the exception of a few companies that have similar or slightly lower EPS values. However, it is important to consider the specific industry, market conditions, and business strategies of each company to fully understand the context of their EPS trends.